<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dual Pane, Tabbed Finder &#8211; TotalFinder vs Path Finder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/</link>
	<description>Tales from a down-shifted family - Making the most of modest means in West Wales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/#comment-21102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/?p=6223#comment-21102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thats how I felt about it, I like keeping my machine lean, and not being redundant in getting multiple apps that serve the same purpose. However what I decided was to use pathfinder only when having to do file management or other tasks that might be tedious in the standard finder, or for anything that can be performed more efficiently. But for daily normal use I use finder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats how I felt about it, I like keeping my machine lean, and not being redundant in getting multiple apps that serve the same purpose. However what I decided was to use pathfinder only when having to do file management or other tasks that might be tedious in the standard finder, or for anything that can be performed more efficiently. But for daily normal use I use finder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/#comment-20954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 13:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/?p=6223#comment-20954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/#comment-20953&quot;&gt;Thierry&lt;/a&gt;.

In the end I decided against using any of them... I&#039;m just using the plain old Finder as none of them quite seemed to improve productivity so i decided it was an unnecessary drain on resources and I&#039;d be better off with simple OSX.

Al.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/#comment-20953">Thierry</a>.</p>
<p>In the end I decided against using any of them&#8230; I&#8217;m just using the plain old Finder as none of them quite seemed to improve productivity so i decided it was an unnecessary drain on resources and I&#8217;d be better off with simple OSX.</p>
<p>Al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thierry		</title>
		<link>https://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/2010/10/dual-pane-tabbed-finder-totalfinder-vs-path-finder/#comment-20953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thierry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alananna.co.uk/blog/?p=6223#comment-20953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,

After more than a year... which one did you decide to use?

Thanks,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>After more than a year&#8230; which one did you decide to use?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
